Kenneth Vercammen is a Middlesex County Trial Attorney who has published 130 articles in national and New Jersey publications on Criminal Law, Probate, Estate and litigation topics.

He was awarded the NJ State State Bar Municipal Court Practitioner of the Year.

He lectures and handles criminal cases, Municipal Court, DWI, traffic and other litigation matters.

To schedule a confidential consultation, call us or New clients email us evenings and weekends via contact box www.njlaws.com.

Kenneth Vercammen & Associates, P.C,

2053 Woodbridge Avenue,

Edison, NJ 08817,

(732) 572-0500

Thursday, March 21, 2019

NJSA 52:14F-5 Powers, Duties of Director and Chief Administrative Law Judge

52:14F-5 Powers, duties of Director and Chief Administrative Law Judge

52:14F-5 Powers, duties of Director and Chief Administrative Law Judge

5.The Director and Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Office of Administrative Law shall:

a.Administer and cause the work of the office to be performed in such manner and pursuant to such program as may be required or appropriate;

b.Organize and reorganize the office, and establish such bureaus as may be required or appropriate;

c.Except as otherwise provided in subsections l. and t., below, appoint, pursuant to the provisions of Title 11A of the New Jersey Statutes, such clerical assistants and other personnel as may be required for the conduct of the office;

d.Assign and reassign personnel to employment within the office;

e.Develop uniform standards, rules of evidence, and procedures, including but not limited to standards for determining whether a summary or plenary hearing should be held to regulate the conduct of contested cases and the rendering of administrative adjudications;

f.Promulgate and enforce such rules for the prompt implementation and coordinated administration of the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.) as may be required or appropriate;

g.Administer and supervise the procedures relating to the conduct of contested cases and the making of administrative adjudications, as defined by section 2 of P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-2);

h.Advise agencies concerning their obligations under the Administrative Procedure Act, subject to the provisions of subsections b. and e. of section 4 of P.L.1944, c.20 (C.52:17A-4); I.Assist agencies in the preparation, consideration, publication and interpretation of administrative rules required or appropriate pursuant to the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.);

j.Employ the services of the several agencies and of the employees thereof in such manner and to such extent as may be agreed upon by the director and the chief executive officer of such agency;

k.Have access to information concerning the several agencies to assure that they properly promulgate all rules required by law;

l.Assign permanent administrative law judges at supervisory and other levels who are qualified in the field of administrative law or in subject matter relating to the hearing functions of a State agency.

Administrative law judges shall receive such salaries as provided by section 4 of P.L.1978, c.67 (C.52:14F-4), as amended by P.L.1999, c.380, shall not engage in the practice of law and shall devote full time to their judicial duties.

Administrative law judges appointed after the effective date of this amendatory act shall have been attorneys-at-law of this State for a minimum of five years. An administrative law judge appointed prior to the effective date of this amendatory act shall not be required to be an attorney or, if an attorney, shall not be required to have been an attorney-at-law for five years in order to be reappointed;

m.Appoint additional administrative law judges, qualified in the field of administrative law or in a subject matter relating to the hearing functions of a State agency, on a temporary or case basis as may be necessary during emergency or unusual situations for the proper performance of the duties of the office, pursuant to a reasonable fee schedule established in advance by the director. Administrative law judges appointed pursuant to this procedure shall have the same qualifications for appointment as permanent administrative law judges;

n.Assign administrative law judges to conduct contested cases as required by sections 9 and 10 of P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-9 and 52:14B-10). Proceedings shall be scheduled for suitable locations, either at the offices of the Office of Administrative Law or elsewhere in the State, taking into consideration the convenience of the witnesses and parties, as well as the nature of the cases and proceedings;

o.Assign an administrative law judge or other personnel, if so requested by the head of an agency and if the director deems appropriate, to any agency to conduct or assist in administrative duties and proceedings other than those related to contested cases or administrative adjudications, including but not limited to rule-making and investigative hearings;

p.Assign an administrative law judge not engaged in the conduct of contested cases to perform other duties vested in or required of the office;

q.Secure, compile and maintain all reports of administrative law judges issued pursuant to this act, and such reference materials and supporting information as may be appropriate;

r.Develop and maintain a program for the continuing training and education of administrative law judges and agencies in regard to their responsibilities under this act;

s.Develop and implement a program of judicial evaluation to aid himself in the performance of his duties, and to assist in the making of reappointments under section 4 of P.L.1978, c.67 (C.52:14F-4). This program of evaluation shall focus on three areas of judicial performance: competence, productivity, and demeanor. It shall include consideration of: industry and promptness in adhering to schedules, making rulings and rendering decisions; tolerance, courtesy, patience, attentiveness, and self-control in dealing with litigants, witnesses and counsel, and in presiding over contested cases; legal skills and knowledge of the law and new legal developments; analytical talents and writing abilities; settlement skills; quantity, nature and quality of caseload disposition; impartiality and conscientiousness. The director shall develop standards and procedures for this program, which shall include taking comments from selected litigants and lawyers who have appeared before a judge. The methods used by the judge but not the result arrived at by the judge in any case may be used in evaluating a judge. Before implementing any action based on the findings of the evaluation program, the director shall discuss the findings and the proposed action with the affected judge. The evaluation by the director and supporting data shall be submitted to the Governor at least 90 days before the expiration of any term. These documents shall remain confidential and shall be exempted from the requirements of P.L.1963, c.73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.);

t.Promulgate and enforce rules for reasonable sanctions, including assessments of costs and attorneys fees which may be imposed on a party, and attorney or other representative of a party who, without just excuse, fails to comply with any procedural order or with any standard or rule applying to a contested case and including the imposition of a fine not to exceed $1,000.00 for misconduct which obstructs or tends to obstruct the conduct of contested cases;

u.Have power in connection with contested case hearings (1) to administer oaths to any and all persons, (2) to compel by subpoena the attendance of witnesses and the production of books, records, accounts, papers, and documents of any person or persons, (3) to entertain objections to subpoenas, and (4) to rule upon objections to subpoenas except, that any orders of administrative law judges regarding these objections may be reviewed by the agency head before the completion of the contested case in accordance with procedural rules, adopted by the Director and Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Office of Administrative Law. Misconduct by any party, attorney or representative of a party or witness which obstructs or tends to obstruct the conduct of a contested case or the failure of any witness, when duly subpoenaed to attend, give testimony or produce any record, or the failure to pay any sanction assessed pursuant to subsection t. of this section, shall be punishable by the Superior Court in the same manner as such failure is punishable by such court in a case pending therein; and

v.Assign any judge recalled pursuant to section 4 of P.L.1978, c.67 (C.52:14F-4) and fix the per diem allowance.

L.1978,c.67,s.5; amended 1981, c.202, s.3; 1993, c.343, s.5; 1999, c.380, s.10; 2005, c.6, s.2.

52:14F-6. Administrative law judges, assignment; special appointment
6. a. Administrative law judges shall be assigned by the director from the office to an agency to preside over contested cases in accordance with the special expertise of the administrative law judge.

b. A person who is not an employee of the office may be specially appointed and assigned by the director to preside over a specific contested case, if the director certifies in writing the reasons why the character of the case requires utilization of a different procedure for assigning administrative law judges than is established by this amendatory and supplementary act.

c. Each administrative law judge shall have and exercise the powers conferred upon the director to the extent that the director shall delegate them by rule.

L.1978,c.67,s.6; amended 1993,c.343,s.6.

52:14F-7. Construction of act
9. a. Nothing in this amendatory and supplementary act shall be construed to deprive the head of any agency of the authority pursuant to section 10 of P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-10) to determine whether a case is contested or to adopt, reject or modify the findings of fact and conclusions of law of any administrative law judge consistent with the standards for the scope of review to be applied by the head of the agency as set forth in that section and applicable case law.

b.Nothing in this amendatory and supplementary act shall be construed to affect the conduct of any contested case initiated prior to the effective date of this act, or the making of any administrative adjudication in such contested case.