A person who is injured as a result of the negligence of another person is what we in the legal profession refer to as a personal injury claimant. In other words, they have been injured as a result of an accident, and now wish to prosecute a claim against a negligent property owner and its insurance company. Kenneth Vercammen & Associates Law Office helps people injured due to the negligence of others. We provide representation throughout New Jersey. The insurance companies will not help. Dont give up! Our Law Office can provide experienced attorney representation if you are injured. If the case cannot settle, and goes to the judge and jury, portion of the Model Jury charge set forth what a judge should tell the jurors, prior to making a decision.
Outline of what the judge tells the jury
1. Explanation of Nature of Case
2. Duty of Citizens to Serve as Jurors
3. Counsels Right to Peremptory Challenges
4. Introduction of Parties, Counsel and Potential Witnesses
5. Identification of Potential Witnesses
6. Particularized Questions
------------------------------------------------------------------INSTRUCTIO NS TO JURORS
1. Explanation of Nature of Case
The judge will address the members of the jury pool and inform them that a number of them (usually between six and twelve and two alternates) will be selected to be jurors for the trial of a civil case. The judge will explain the nature of the case. For example: It arises out of an automobile accident that occurred on Route #1, here in Middlesex County, on ( date ). The plaintiff brings this suit contending that the accident was caused by the negligence or fault of the driver of the other vehicle. She sues to recover money damages for the injuries she says she sustained in the accident. Her husband is also a plaintiff and he sues for money damages to compensate him for his losses. The defendant in the case denies that he caused this accident. The jury will be asked to decide fault for the accident and, if the plaintiffs are entitled to an award of damages. The jury will also be asked to decide on the appropriate amount.
2. Duty of Citizens to Serve As Jurors
Serving as a juror is inconvenient, but jury service is an important duty of citizenship. Having jurors available to decide the facts in lawsuits is fundamental to our entire system of justice. The courts cannot function without members of the public offering their time to serve as jurors.
3. Counsels Right To Peremptory Challenges
After the judge has asked you a number of questions which relate to your ability to hear and decide this case with an open mind and with complete impartiality. The attorneys who represent the parties in the lawsuit can exercise the right to excuse one or more of the jurors without giving any explanation or reason. If they are excused in that manner, please do not take it personally. No offense is intended. The law traditionally gives each attorney the right to have a limited number of jurors excused for no expressed reason.
4. Introduction Of Parties, Counsel and Potential Witnesses
The judge will introduce the parties to the lawsuit as follows: [The judge will give the full name and municipality of residence of each party. If the parties are present in the courtroom, the Court may, in its discretion, ask the party to stand so that the jury can identify him or her.] The attorneys who represent the parties are: [The judge will give the full name of each attorney and the law firm for which he or she appears. The Court should consider asking each attorney to rise upon introduction by the Court. The Court might consider the option of asking each attorney to introduce himself or herself and the party represented in lieu of the Court performing the introduction.] Do any of you jurors know any of the parties to this lawsuit or do you know anyone you believe to be related to or acquainted with any party to the lawsuit? [If an affirmative answer, ask the juror to explain.] Do any of you jurors know any attorney involved in this lawsuit or any member of the firm for which the attorney appears? Have you or anyone close to you ever been represented by any of the law firms whose name the judge has just given you? [If an affirmative answer, ask the juror to explain.]
5. Identification Of Potential Witnesses
The court will now identify for jurors all persons who are potential witnesses in this trial. [Give name and address or some identification of each potential witness.] Because knowing one of the potential witnesses might influence your independent and impartial judgment of the facts of this case, the judge needs to know if you recognize any of the names the judge just read. Do you know any of the potential witnesses in this trial? [If an affirmative answer, ask the juror to explain.]
6. Particularized Questions
[At this point, the Court should question the jurors about all subjects that might influence their impartiality. The nature of those questions will depend upon the nature and the specific facts of the case to be tried.] [In the event the Court anticipates that some jurors may be asked to answer certain questions at side-bar in the presence of only the Court and the attorneys, the following instruction should be considered.] The judge may occasionally suggest a conference over here at the side of the Bench because there is a possibility that your comment could influence the other jurors if they heard it. You also might feel more comfortable responding to the questions in some degree of privacy rather than in front of everyone in the courtroom. These conferences will be on the record the same as every other word that is spoken in this courtroom.
Model Civil Jury Charges
1.11 PRELIMINARY CHARGE [To be given after the jury is sworn in but before the openings.] Outline
A. Role of Jury, Court and Attorneys
B. Prohibition Against Discussing the Case
C. Jurors Not to Visit the Accident Scene or Do Investigations
D. Note-Taking Prohibited
E. Outline of Order of Events
F. Settling Defendants
A. Role of Jury, Court and Attorneys
The judge will say, "As the jury in this case, you will be the judges of the facts and you will be the only judges of the facts. You will have to decide what happened. The judge plays no part in judging the facts. That is the jurors responsibility. The judge role is to be the judge of the law, that is to say, the judge makes whatever legal decisions have to be made during the course of the trial, and the judge will explain to you the legal principles that must guide you in your decisions on the facts. You are to judge the facts in this case based upon the evidence presented to you and based only on the evidence. This evidence will consist of the testimony of witnesses, the exhibits marked into evidence, and any material that we read to you. As the trier of fact, it will be your job to judge the believability of the witnesses. Size up the witness. Is the witness telling the truth? Does the witness know what he/she is talking about? How good is the witnesss recollection? Is the witness accurate and correct in what he/she is saying? You may also consider the demeanor of the witness, that is, how is the witness behaving and responding to the questions asked. You may believe part of the witnesss testimony and not believe other parts of it." During the trial, the judge will be required to rule on the admission or rejection of evidence. You are to give no consideration to any evidence that the judge rules to be inadmissible and you are not to speculate or guess about what that evidence might have been or what it might have meant. Do not infer from any rulings the judge makes in this case or anything the judge says what his/her feelings might be about the outcome of this case. Even if you knew what the judges feelings were, you should disregard them, because it is the your decisions on the facts that control, not the judges. At the close of the entire case, the judge will explain to you the law, which applies to this case. You must accept the law as the judge explains it to you and apply it to the facts as you find them to be based on the evidence. During the course of the trial, you will hear from the attorneys on numerous occasions. Always bear in mind that the attorneys are not witnesses and what they say is not evidence in the case, whether they are arguing, objecting or asking questions. The attorneys are here as advocates and spokespersons for their clients positions.
B. Prohibition Against Discussing the Case
This case is very important to all the parties involved. They are entitled to the full attention of the jury throughout the trial and to fair and impartial consideration of the case by the jury. It is important, therefore, that you keep an open mind about this case until the very end when you are in the jury room deliberating. You are not to make any judgments or come to any conclusions about this case, until you have heard the whole story and that means until all the evidence is presented and the judge has explained the law to you. You are not to have any contact or discussions with any of the parties, their attorneys, or any of the witnesses. You are not to discuss the case with anyone or permit anyone to discuss the case with you, whether here in the courthouse or anywhere outside the courthouse. If anyone attempts to discuss this case with you or attempts to influence your judgment about the case, you are to report that to the judge immediately. If you are to keep an open mind, you must not even discuss this case among yourselves until it is over and you are deliberating. That means, when you convene each morning, as you are leaving at the end of each trial day and during your recesses and breaks you are not to talk about this case among yourselves. Do not discuss this case with anyone that is not on the jury. This includes your family and friends. When you go home, you may tell your family you have been selected as a juror in a civil case and the expected length of the trial. You should not tell them anything more about the case. Even though a further explanation by you may begin innocently, once you finish talking the other person is not going to just stand there and say nothing. That person will say something and that response may influence your thinking. Your thinking should be influenced only by what you learn in the courtroom.
C. Jurors Not to Visit Accident Scene or Do Investigations
While this case is pending, you must not visit the (accident) scene. That area may have changed from the time of the (accident/incident) until now. In addition, do not do any research or make any investigations about this case on your own. That is not your job. You are here to decide this case based solely on the evidence presented in this courtroom.
D. Note-Taking (When note taking is prohibited)
You will not be permitted to take notes during this trial. The concern is that note-taking would be distracting, that notes would often be incomplete and that undue weight may be given to the notes. The court wants you to rely upon your combined recollection of all the evidence.
E. Outline of Order of Events
The trial will start with the attorneys opening statements. In their opening statements the attorneys will explain to you the position of their clients in this litigation. They will tell you what they think this case is about, and what they believe the evidence will show. The opening statements are designed to highlight for you the disagreements and factual differences between the parties in order to help you judge the significance of the evidence when it is presented. Once the attorneys have made their opening statements then each party is given an opportunity to present its evidence. First, the plaintiff presents its evidence. Then the defense will present its evidence. Each witness will undergo direct examination which means that the attorney calling the witness will ask that person questions. After that the other attorneys are given an opportunity to question the witness, which is referred to as cross-examination. Once all the evidence has been presented, the attorneys will make their closing arguments. They will give you their analysis of what the evidence means and will attempt to highlight the significant evidence that is helpful to their clients positions. Once the closing arguments are completed, the judge will instruct you on the legal principles to be followed when deciding this case.
F. Settling Defendants
When this case started, the plaintiff claimed that there was a cause of the accident. Before the trial started, settled with plaintiff and for that reason will no longer be involved in this trial. The effect of that settlement on the parties still here is of no concern to you at the present time and you should not speculate about that. The judge will explain the effect that settlement will have on your deliberations at the end of the case.
------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL PROVISIONS AND OUTLINE FOR STANDARD CHARGE (11/98)
Outline
Introduction
A. Purpose of Charge
B. Role of the Court
C. Role of the Attorneys
D. Role of the Jury
E. The Evidence
F. Contention of the Parties
G. Burden of Proof
H. Preponderance of the Evidence
I. Direct and Circumstantial Evidence or Inferences
J. Credibility
K. False in One - False in All
L. Damages
M. No Prejudice, Passion, Bias or Sympathy
N. Deliberations
O. Alternates
P. Verdict
Q. Jury Verdict Sheet
R. Communications with Court
------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Purpose of Charge
The judge is now going to tell you about the principles of law governing this case. You are required to accept the judges instructions as the law. (You should consider these instructions as a whole, and do not pick out any particular instruction and place undue emphasis upon it).
B. Role of the Court
The judge sits here as the judge of the law. As part of this responsibility, the judge will make various rulings and statements throughout this trial. Do not view these rulings and statements as clues about how the judge thinks this case should be decided. They are not. They are based solely on the judges understanding of the law and rules of evidence, and they do not reflect any opinions of the judge about the merits of this case. Even if they did, you should disregard them, because it is the your role to decide this case, not the judges.
C. Role of the Attorneys
The lawyers are here as advocates for their clients. In their opening statements and in their summations, they have given you their views of the evidence and their arguments in favor of their clients position. While you may consider their comments, nothing that the attorneys say is evidence and their comments are not binding upon you. (In addition, you must not decide this case based on the performance of the attorneys.)
D. Role of the Jury
You sit here as judges of the facts. You alone have the responsibility of deciding the factual issues in this case. It is the your recollection and evaluation of the evidence that controls. If the attorneys or the judge say anything about the facts in this case that disagrees with your recollection of the evidence, it is your recollection that you should rely on. Your decision in this case must be based solely on the evidence presented and the judges instructions on the law.
E. The Evidence
The evidence in this case consists of [refer to appropriate items]: 1. the testimony that you heard from the witness (including any videotaped testimony); 2. the exhibits that have been marked into evidence; 3. the deposition testimony and answers to interrogatories that were read into the record; 4. the stipulations and admissions that were placed on the record. As you recall, the stipulation and admissions are facts that the parties agree are true. Therefore, you can accept all admissions and stipulations as true in your deliberations.
(Use when applicable) Any testimony that the judge has stricken from the record is not evidence and should not be considered by you in your deliberations. This means that even though you may remember the testimony, you are not to use it in your discussions or deliberations.
F. Contention of the Parties
[Judge explains the contentions of the parties.]
G. Burden of Proof
The burden of proof is on the plaintiff/each party to establish his/her/their claim by a preponderance of the evidence. In other words, if a person makes an allegation, then that person must prove the allegation. In this action, the plaintiff has the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence all of the facts necessary to prove the following issues:
[Judge explains issues raised by defendant.]
H. Preponderance of the Evidence
The term "preponderance of the evidence" means the amount of evidence that causes you to conclude that the allegation is probably true. To prove an allegation by the preponderance of the evidence, a party must convince you that the allegation is more likely true than not true. If the evidence on a particular issue is equally balanced, that issue has not been proven by a preponderance of the evidence. Therefore, the party having the burden of proving that issue has failed with respect to that particular issue.
I. Direct and Circumstantial Evidence or Inferences
1. Direct and Circumstantial Evidence Evidence may be direct or circumstantial. Direct evidence is direct proof of a fact, such as the testimony of an eyewitness. Circumstantial evidence (sometimes called inferences) consists of a chain of circumstances pointing to the existence of certain facts. Circumstantial evidence is based upon deductions or logical conclusions that you reach from the direct evidence. An example of direct and circumstantial evidence is followed. If a witness testified that he/she observed snow falling last night, that would be an example of direct evidence. On the other hand, if a witness testified that there was no snow on the ground before going to sleep and that when he/she arose in the morning the ground was snow covered, the jurors could infer from these facts that it snowed during the night. That would be an example of circumstantial evidence. You may consider both direct and circumstantial evidence in deciding this case. The law permits you to give equal weight to both, but it is for you to decide how much weight to give to any evidence.
2. Inferences When deciding this case, you are permitted to draw inferences from the evidence. Inferences are deductions or logical conclusions drawn from the evidence. Use logic, your collective common knowledge, and your common sense when determining what inferences can be made from the evidence.
J. Credibility
You will have to decide which witnesses to believe and which witnesses not to believe. Regardless of whether the witness is a lay person or expert, you may believe everything a witness said or only part of it or none of it. In deciding what testimony to believe, you may take into consideration:
1. the witness interest, if any in the outcome of this case; 2. the accuracy of the witness recollection; 3. the witness ability to know what he/she is talking about; 4. the reasonableness of the testimony; 5. the witness demeanor on the stand; 6. the witness candor or evasion; 7. the witness willingness or reluctance to answer; 8. the inherent believability of the testimony; 9. the presence of any inconsistent or contradictory statements.
K. False in One - False in All
[A trial judge has the discretion to give this charge in any situation in which the judge reasonably believes a jury may find a basis for its application. See State v. Ernst, 32 N.J. 567 (1960). When given, this charge usually will follow the section on credibility.]
(Sample l) If you believe that any witness deliberately lied to you, on any fact significant to your decision in this case, you have the right to reject all of that witnesss testimony. However in your discretion you may believe some of the testimony and not believe other parts of the testimony.
L. Damages
The judge will now instruct the jurors on the law governing damages in the event you decide the liability issue in favor of the plaintiff. The fact that the judge instructs you on damages should not be considered as suggesting any view of the judge about which party is entitled to prevail in this case. Instructions on damages are given for your guidance in the event they find that the plaintiff is entitled to a verdict. The judge is required to provide instructions on damages in all cases where the trial includes a claim for damages. The plaintiff has the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence each item of damages that he/she claims. The plaintiff must also prove that the damages were the natural and probable consequences of the defendants negligence. The accident must have been a proximate cause of the damages. Damages may not be based on conjecture or speculation. In this case the plaintiff is seeking the following types of damages [select the appropriate categories]: 1. medical expenses [Charge 6. ll A.]; 2. past and future lost wages [Charge 6.11D.]; 3. pain, suffering, disability, impairment and loss of enjoyment of life [Charge 6. ll F. & G.]. In addition, the plaintiffs spouse is seeking compensation in what we call a per quod claim [Charge 6.12].
M. No Prejudice, Passion, Bias or Sympathy
Your oath as jurors requires you to decide this case fairly and impartially, without sympathy, passion, bias or prejudice. You are to decide this case based solely upon the evidence that you find believable and in accordance with the rules of law that the judge gives you. Sympathy is an emotion which is normal for human beings. No one can be critical of you for feeling some degree of sympathy in this matter. However, that sympathy must play no part in your thinking and in the decision you reach in the jury room. Similarly, your decision must not be based upon bias or prejudice which you might have developed during the trial, for or against any party. Your duty is to decide this case impartially and a decision based on sympathy, passion, bias or prejudice would violate that duty.
N. Deliberations
Jurors are not advocates for either party. You are judges of the facts. Your sole interest is to determine the truth from the evidence in the case. It is your duty, as jurors, to consult with one another and to deliberate with a view to reaching an agreement, if you can do so without compromising your individual judgment. Each of you must decide the case for yourself, but do so only after an impartial consideration of the evidence with the other jurors.
O. Alternates
There are now (seven/eight) of you in the jury box. Six of you will make up the jury which will deliberate and decide the case. The other(s) will be alternate jurors who will participate if one of the other jurors is unable to continue for some reason. Then the alternate will serve as a replacement. [See R. 1:8-2(d).]
P. Verdict
Since this is a civil case, any verdict of 5-1 or 6-0 is a legal verdict. Therefore, it is not necessary that all six jurors agree on each question. An agreement of any five jurors is sufficient. All six jurors must deliberate fully and fairly on each and every question, and all six jurors must determine and vote upon each question. It is not necessary that the same five jurors agree upon the answers to all questions. Whenever at least five jurors have agreed to any answer, that question has been decided, and you may move on to consider the remaining questions in the case if it is appropriate to do so. All six jurors must participate fully in deliberating on the remaining questions. A juror who has been outvoted on any question shall continue to deliberate with the other jurors fairly, impartially, honestly and conscientiously to decide the remaining questions. Each juror must consider each question with an open mind. When at least five of you have agreed upon a verdict, knock on the jury room door. Indicate to the attendant that you have reached a verdict and say nothing more. The attendant will escort you back to the jury box so that the court may receive your verdict.
Q. Jury Verdict Sheet
The judge will prepare a jury verdict sheet which the judge believes should make your task simpler. The judge will be sending that sheet with you to the jury room. The sheet has questions that you must consider and answer within the framework of the instructions that the judge has given you.
R. Communications with Court
After you have begun deliberations, all communications are done by sending a note from your foreperson. Knock on the door and hand the note to the attendant. No member of the jury should communicate with anyone outside the jury room except in this fashion. No member of the jury should indicate at any time how the jury stands numerically or otherwise until after you have reached a verdict. When the judge receives your note that it has reached a verdict, the attorneys will be gathered, and the judge will have the entire jury into court to receive the verdict. [Note: the jury may have the foreperson read the verdict sheet or the judge may ask the question on the verdict sheet and have the foreperson respond and give the vote.] Should you desire to communicate for any other reason, you must send a note in the same fashion. After the judge has your note, the judge will discuss it with counsel and then reply to you in open court on the record.
