Kenneth Vercammen is a Middlesex County Trial Attorney who has published 130 articles in national and New Jersey publications on Criminal Law, Probate, Estate and litigation topics.

He was awarded the NJ State State Bar Municipal Court Practitioner of the Year.

He lectures and handles criminal cases, Municipal Court, DWI, traffic and other litigation matters.

To schedule a confidential consultation, call us or New clients email us evenings and weekends via contact box www.njlaws.com.

Kenneth Vercammen & Associates, P.C,

2053 Woodbridge Avenue,

Edison, NJ 08817,

(732) 572-0500

Friday, March 16, 2018

CONTRABAND 2C:29‑6b) model jury charge

PROVIDING AN INMATE WITH CONTRABAND[1]
(N.J.S.A. 2C:29‑6b)model jury charge
Under the circumstances of this case, I charge you that you should also consider whether defendant has committed the offense of providing contraband to an inmate of an institution or a detention facility.
The relevant statute provides that A person commits a[n]...offense if he provides an inmate with any other thing [than a weapon, tool or other thing which may be useful for escape] which he knows or should know it is unlawful for the inmate to possess.
To obtain a conviction on this charge, the State must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1)That defendant provided S1 to an inmate of an institution or a detention facility;
(2)That S1 is not a weapon, tool or other thing which may be useful for escape; and
(3)That defendant knew or should have known that it was unlawful for the inmate to possess S1.


I have already defined the relevant terms for you.If you find that the State has failed to prove any one or more of the elements of this offense beyond a reasonable doubt, then your verdict should be Not Guilty.On the other hand, if you find that the State has proven all of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, then your verdict should be Guilty.