Kenneth Vercammen is a Middlesex County Trial Attorney who has published 130 articles in national and New Jersey publications on Criminal Law, Probate, Estate and litigation topics.

He was awarded the NJ State State Bar Municipal Court Practitioner of the Year.

He lectures and handles criminal cases, Municipal Court, DWI, traffic and other litigation matters.

To schedule a confidential consultation, call us or New clients email us evenings and weekends via contact box www.njlaws.com.

Kenneth Vercammen & Associates, P.C,

2053 Woodbridge Avenue,

Edison, NJ 08817,

(732) 572-0500

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

DWI Driver Could Turn Around to Avoid Road Block. State v. Badessa 373 NJ Super. 84 (App. Div. 2004)-New articles, ABA newsletters & Community eventst

DWI Driver Could Turn Around to Avoid Road Block. State v. Badessa 373 NJ Super. 84 (App. Div. 2004)

When a DWI checkpoint zone encompasses intersecting roads, proper on-the-scene warnings must include signs indicating no turns. Absent adequate warnings, the stop of a driver who makes a lawful turn onto an intersecting road within a DWI checkpoint zone is invalid unless there is an independent probable cause for the stop. 2. Defendant's refusal to submit to a Breathalyzer test (refusal), in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.49(a), is sufficiently attenuated from an illegal stop that evidence of the refusal is admissible at trial. 3. The refusal statute, N. J. S. A. 39:4-50.2(a), is premised on a driver's consent to submit to a Breathalyzer test when an officer has probable cause to believe that the driver is intoxicated. Consequently, it is not the probable cause for the stop but the probable cause to request the Breathalyzer test that provides the constitutional basis for a refusal charge.